Custom Manufacturing & Precision Machining Company
Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) 3D Printing Services2025-08-28T08:32:21+00:00

MJF (Multi Jet Fusion) 3D Printing Service

MJF (Multi Jet Fusion) 3D printing uses high-speed inkjet printing and fusing agents to produce durable, high-quality parts with complex geometries.

  • Fast production of functional prototypes and end-use parts
  • Ideal for producing low to medium volume runs
  • High precision with a wide range of material options

MJF 3D Printing: What Is It & How Does It Work?

MJF (Multi Jet Fusion) 3D printing is an advanced additive manufacturing process developed by HP, which still holds patents for the technology. It creates parts by selectively fusing powdered material—typically nylon or similar polymers—using chemical agents and heat.

The process begins with a thin, even layer of powder spread across the build platform. Specialized printheads then deposit a fusing agent on areas meant to solidify, plus a detailing agent along edges to sharpen boundaries and boost precision. Next, a powerful infrared heating element passes over the layer: treated areas fuse into solid material, while untreated powder stays loose. This layering cycle repeats—new powder spread, selectively fused—until the part is fully built.

Known for high precision and efficiency, MJF produces complex geometries with consistent strength. After printing, parts are extracted from loose powder and may undergo post-processing (cleaning, dyeing, smoothing, coating) to enhance appearance and performance.

Our MJF 3D Printing Services

mjf 3d printed part

Prototype Manufacturing Service

  • Rapid sampling in 24hrs, supporting design iterations
  • Precision up to ±0.1mm, meeting prototype verification needs
  • Suitable for product validation & exhibition samples
mjf 3d printed part

Low-Volume Production Service

  • Mold-free production, flexible for 10-1000 units
  • Delivery cycle: 1-5 days, shortening time-to-market
  • Covers medical/automotive/consumer electronics parts
mjf 3d printed functional part

Functional Part Customization

  • PA12 material: impact-resistant & wear-resistant
  • Supports post-processing (sanding/dyeing/spray painting)
  • Applicable to industrial equipment/robotics/outdoor gear parts

MJF Capabilities & Design Guidelines

Design ParameterUSMetric
Maximum Part Size11.1 x 14.9 x 14.9 in284 x 380 x 380 mm
Layer Thickness0.00315 in80 microns
Minimum Feature Size0.020 in0.5 mm
Wall Thickness0.020 in0.5 mm
Resolution± 0.012 in±0.3 mm
Dimensional Accuracy±0.3% (min. ±0.012”)±0.3% (min. ±0.3 mm)
Tolerance± 0.012 in + 0.1% per inch± 0.30 mm + 0.1% per 25.4 mm
Warpage SusceptibilityParts >7 in prone to warpingUse ≥ 0.125 in thickness
Clearance for Assemblies0.006 - 0.010 in0.15 - 0.25 mm
Hole Diameter≥ 0.04 in≥ 1 mm
Embossed Features≥ 0.02 in height≥ 0.5 mm height
Engraved Features≥ 0.04 in depth & width≥ 1 mm depth & width
Lattice Structure Gap Size≥ 0.04 in≥ 1 mm
mjf 3d printed parts

MJF Material Options

3d printing materials
Material Tensile Strength Elongation at Break Tensile Modulus
PA 12 Black 48 MPa/6960 psi at XY & Z 20% at XY; 15% at Z 1700 MPa/247 ksi at XY; 1800 MPa/261 ksi at Z
PA 12 40% Glass-Filled Black 30 MPa/4351 psi 10% 2500 MPa/363 ksi at XY, XZ, YX, YZ; 2700 MPa/392 ksi at ZX, XY
PA 11 52 MPa/7542 psi 55% at XY, XZ, YX, YZ; 40% at ZX, ZY 1800 MPa/261 ksi
PP 25-30 MPa/3626-4351 psi 15-20% at XY; 10-14% at Z 1300-1500 MPa/189-218 ksi
TPU 88A 7-9 MPa/1015-1305 psi 120-220% 75-85 MPa/10.9-12.3 ksi

These figures are approximate and influenced by various factors, such as machine settings and process parameters. As a result, the information provided is not binding or certified. For critical performance requirements, independent lab testing of additive materials or final parts is recommended.

MJF Post-processing Options

Surface Finishing Description
Sanding (Standard) Bead blasting removes all excess powder, leaving a uniform texture.
Vapor Smoothing Reduces surface roughness from 250+ μin RA (as-printed) to 64 – 100 μin RA. Applicable for all MJF printed materials.
Dyeing A main way to color MJF parts (usually black).
Custom Finishing Includes secondary options such as priming, tapping, and inserts for enhanced part functionality.

Other post-processing services we provide are:

Why Choose MJF 3D Printing?

High Precision & Consistent Isotropic Performance

MJF’s size accuracy is top-notch—error stays within ±0.3% (and can go as low as ±0.3mm)—and what really matters is its uniform strength across all print directions (XY and Z axes). Unlike some 3D printing tech that has weaker spots in certain directions, MJF parts keep steady performance whether you need toughness, rigidity, or flexibility. That’s a big deal for industrial parts like gears, brackets, or medical fittings—where you can’t afford unpredictable strength.

Design Freedom Without Support Structures

Since MJF uses a powder bed, you don’t need to add support structures when printing. That means you can make super complex shapes: intricate lattices, hollow insides, undercuts, even nested parts—all in one piece—without later having to remove supports. For things like lightweight aerospace components or custom medical implants, this takes away design limits. Plus, it cuts down on material waste and the time you’d spend on post-processing.

Fast Turnaround for Prototyping & Small-Batch Production

MJF hits a sweet spot between speed and scalability. You can get high-quality prototypes in just 1–3 days, which lets you tweak designs fast during product development. For small-batch runs (10 to 1,000+ parts), it’s way better than traditional methods: no expensive molds, no long wait times like with injection molding or machining. Its powder bed also lets you print multiple parts at once, so per-part costs stay low for low-to-medium volumes—perfect for bridging the gap between prototyping and full-scale manufacturing.

Versatile Material Compatibility for Diverse Applications

MJF works with a range of high-performance polymers, each built for specific needs: PA11 (made from castor oil, so it’s bio-based—flexible, stands up to low temps, great for outdoor gear or medical parts), PA12 (tough, resists chemicals, ideal for industrial components), PP (lightweight, budget-friendly, good for consumer goods), and TPU 88A (rubbery, absorbs shocks, perfect for gaskets or soft grips). Pair these with post-processing like vapor smoothing, dyeing, or plating, and MJF fits right in with industries from automotive and healthcare to consumer electronics and industrial equipment.

Need a quote for your custom parts?

Get yours in 24 hours—no obligations, just fast, tailored numbers.

Typical Applications for MJP 3D Printing

Prototyping and Product Development

Functional Prototypes: Examples include mechanical test parts, housings, and brackets designed for product validation.

Rapid Prototypes: Concept models, form and fit prototypes, or parts to visualize design ideas quickly.

Design Iteration Parts: Parts used for multiple iterations in the product development process, such as prototypes for ergonomic testing.

Bridge and Short-Run Production

Small-Batch Production Parts: Low-volume production of custom gears, tools, or brackets for limited runs.

End-use Test Parts: Components produced for market testing or low-volume product introductions, such as custom enclosures or functional snap-fit parts.

Replacement Parts: Parts produced on-demand for replacement in ongoing production, such as machine components or tooling parts.

Durable End-Use Parts

Automotive Components: Custom connectors, housings, or brackets that are used in functional automotive parts like interior components or engine enclosures.

Medical Devices: Surgical guides, anatomical models, or functional prototypes for implants and dental appliances.

Consumer Goods: Custom housings for electronics, wearables, or accessories that require both functionality and durability.

Complex Geometries and Fine Details

Organic Geometries: Medical models or prosthetics designed with intricate, organic shapes like complex bone structures or custom orthodontic devices.

Parts with Fine Features: Small components with fine features, such as clips, brackets, or detailed electronics enclosures, requiring high resolution and surface finish.

Thin-Walled Parts: Lightweight structures for applications like drone parts, small housings, or intricate components where weight and strength are critical.

Case Studies

case study robot finger printed by mjf

Project: Redesigned Assistive Robot Finger

Additive Technology Used: HP Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) with Nylon 12

Original Materials: 12 off-the-shelf hardware components and 5 injection-molded system parts

Redesigned Materials: A single print-in-place assembly, one small hardware access cover, and one steel spring

A robotics manufacturer faced challenges with their assistive robot finger, which relied on 12 off-the-shelf hardware parts and 5 injection-molded components. This setup led to complex assembly workflows, high inventory costs, and short part lifespans, prompting the manufacturer to seek a solution that would simplify production and boost durability.
But they noticed that each robot finger required 2 hours of assembly, with an 8% error rate from issues like misaligned joints or loose screws. The parts also had a short 6-month lifespan due to cracking at joints, and injection mold prototypes took 6 weeks to produce—slowing down design iterations.
To address these issues, they turned to us and we redesigned the robot finger using HP MJF technology with Nylon 12, a material chosen for its impact and wear resistance. The key improvement was consolidating the 17 original parts into a single print-in-place assembly, with only one small hardware access cover and one steel spring retained as secondary components. Reinforced ribbing was added at joint areas to strengthen high-stress points, and MJF enabled 24-hour prototype turnaround to speed up testing.
The results were significant: assembly time was cut by 95%, dropping from 2 hours to just 6 minutes per finger, while the lifespan increased by 300% to 24 months. Time-to-market was also shortened by 75%, with the first production run of 500 units delivered in 5 days compared to 8 weeks for traditional injection molding. This case is ideal for robotics teams looking to optimize small-batch moving parts, as it simplifies assembly and boosts durability.
case study FAST Spiral Nasopharyngeal Swab

Project: FAST Spiral Nasopharyngeal Swab

Additive Technology Used: HP Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) with Nylon 12

Original Materials: Traditional injection-molded plastic swabs with multiple assembly steps

Redesigned Materials: A single one-piece MJF-printed swab with a spiral tip for improved sample collection efficiency

A medical equipment company is dedicated to improving its traditional injection molding nasal swabs. These swabs have problems such as low sample retention rate, numerous assembly defects, and hard material. The company needs a one-time molded medical-grade swab design that can be produced quickly to meet the demand for reliable respiratory sample collection tools.​
The traditional swabs had several drawbacks: they retained only 0.1–0.2mg of biological sample on average, leading to high false-negative test results, and the two-piece design (handle + fiber tip) required gluing—resulting in a 15% defect rate from tip detachment. Production lead times were also lengthy, with 10,000 swabs taking 3 weeks to make, and the rigid PP material caused patient discomfort during use.
The solution was developing a one-piece FAST Spiral Nasopharyngeal Swab using HP MJF technology with medical-grade Nylon 12, which meets ISO 10993-1 biocompatibility standards. MJF’s precision allowed for a spiral-shaped tip that increased sample retention surface area by 300%, while the one-piece design eliminated assembly-related defects. Post-print gamma sterilization ensured no material leaching, keeping the swabs compliant with medical regulations.
The redesign delivered impactful results: sample retention improved by 250% to 0.5–0.6mg, reducing false-negative rates by 12%, and the defect rate dropped to just 0.5% from 15%. Production speed also increased by 80%, with 10,000 swabs delivered in 3 days instead of 3 weeks. This case is key for medical device designers optimizing single-use tools, as it boosts performance and ensures regulatory compliance.
FAQs question mark

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MJF Suitable for Mass Production?2025-08-28T07:32:53+00:00

MJF isn’t the first choice for ultra-high-volume mass production (like millions of identical parts, where injection molding still leads on cost per unit), but it’s highly suitable for mid-scale mass production (typically 1,000–100,000 parts) and solves key pain points that traditional methods struggle with.

First, it cuts lead times: no need to wait weeks/months for expensive injection molds—you can start production in days once the design is final, which is a game-changer for fast-moving markets (e.g., consumer electronics, medical devices). Second, it handles complexity without extra cost: unlike molding, adding intricate features (lattices, undercuts) or small design tweaks mid-production doesn’t raise expenses, which works for parts that need customization or frequent updates.

It also stays cost-effective at scale: MJF’s ability to pack multiple parts into one build (maximizing powder bed use) and fast layer processing (entire layers fused at once, vs. laser tracing) keeps per-part costs low for mid-volume runs. For example, producing 10,000 nylon housings with MJF might be cheaper than molding if you factor in mold costs and design iterations.

The catch? For parts needing 1M+ units, injection molding still has lower per-unit costs. But for most “mass production” needs that balance volume, speed, and flexibility, MJF is a strong, practical option.

What are the post-processing options for MJF parts?2025-08-28T07:36:39+00:00

The choice of post-processing for MJF parts boils down to industry needs and part functionality—different scenarios call for distinct, purpose-driven options:

For medical or food-contact components (e.g., custom testing tools, lightweight brackets), vapor smoothing is a top pick. It refines rough as-printed surfaces (reducing RA from 250+ μin to 64–100 μin) without extra coatings, avoiding chemical residues that could compromise biocompatibility or hygiene. Many also pair it with vibratory tumbling to quickly remove edge burrs, ensuring safe handling during use.

Industrial equipment parts (e.g., robot joints, sensor housings) prioritize durability and uniform appearance, making sandblasting a go-to. It eliminates leftover powder while creating a consistent matte finish; for added resilience against oils or corrosion, teams often follow with spray painting (using industrial-grade, wear-resistant paints). For part labeling (e.g., model numbers), pad printing or silk screening works better—both deliver high-adhesion designs that stand up to long-term friction in industrial settings.

And for consumer electronics (e.g., headphone casings), black dyeing gives long-lasting color; premium pieces use PVD coating (metallic finishes) or custom painting. Laser engraving works for precise logos.

Lastly, for special needs: Electroplating (nickel/copper) for conductive parts, specialty coatings (rubberized) for non-slip handles, or post-machining (tapping/inserts) for assembly-ready parts.

What are the typical applications of MJF 3D printing?2025-08-28T07:38:06+00:00

MJF 3D printing is used across key industries for functional parts: it makes robotics joints, industrial brackets, medical surgical tools and swabs, consumer electronics casings, and automotive interior trim—all leveraging its speed, precision, and durable polymer performance.

How to choose between MJF and SLS?2025-08-28T08:44:48+00:00
MJF (Multi Jet Fusion, HP-patented) and SLS (Selective Laser Sintering) are both powder bed fusion 3D printing technologies—ideal for polymer parts like nylon prototypes or small-batch components—but they differ in speed, precision, cost, and performance. Below is a clear breakdown to help you decide based on your project needs:

1. Core Working Principle: Chemical Fusion vs. Laser Sintering

  • MJF: Uses specialized printheads to deposit fusing agents (on areas to solidify) and detailing agents (for edge sharpness), then an infrared (IR) heater fuses the treated powder. The agent-driven process enables uniform heat distribution across the build bed.
  • SLS: Relies on a high-powered laser (e.g., CO₂) to directly sinter (melt and bond) powdered material in targeted areas. The laser’s focused energy means heat is concentrated only on the part’s cross-section.

2. Speed: MJF Leads for Efficiency

When speed matters, MJF pulls ahead—especially for medium or large build volumes. Its infrared heater processes entire layers at once, while SLS’s laser has to trace every line of the part’s cross-section one by one. For example: 50 small nylon brackets might take 8–12 hours with MJF, but 16–24 hours with SLS. So if you need fast turnarounds—like urgent prototypes or small-batch runs with tight deadlines—MJF is the better bet.

3. Precision & Surface Quality: MJF for Sharper Details

Thanks to its detailing agent, MJF produces parts with crisper edges, finer features (e.g., 0.5mm embossed text), and more consistent surface finishes (as-printed RA ~100–250 μin). SLS parts often have slightly rougher surfaces (RA ~150–300 μin) and may show subtle “laser trace” lines on edges, requiring more post-processing (e.g., sanding) for smoothness.
  • Choose MJF if your part needs tight tolerances (±0.1–0.3mm) or visible fine details (e.g., consumer electronics housings, medical device components).
  • SLS works for less detail-critical parts (e.g., industrial brackets, structural supports).

4. Material Compatibility: SLS Offers More Variety

SLS has more variety. Both work well with nylon (PA11, PA12), but SLS handles a wider range of polymers—things like PA6, PA66, TPU, PP, and even specialty materials (glass-filled nylon or flame-retardant plastics) for high-temperature or high-strength needs. MJF mostly sticks to HP’s own nylon grades (PA11, PA12) and a small selection of TPU/PP (though it’s adding more slowly). If you need a niche material—say, flame-retardant PA6—SLS is the way to go. MJF works best if you’re using standard nylons or TPUs.

5. Cost: Balancing Upfront & Per-Part Expenses

Initial investment: The MJF machine (HP Jet Fusion series) is more expensive than the entry-level SLS system, which makes SLS more suitable for small studios or internal use.
Single-piece cost: The high speed and efficiency of MJF have reduced the single-piece cost for mass production (such as 100 or more parts), as it maximizes the utilization of the printing bed and reduces labor time. While SLS may be cheaper in small-batch, low-production production (such as 1 to 10 prototypes) because its machine operating costs are lower.

6. Mechanical Performance: MJF for Isotropy

Both make strong, durable parts, but MJF’s even heat fusion creates more “isotropic” parts—meaning consistent strength in all directions (XY and Z axes). SLS parts sometimes have slight strength differences by direction (like a little less strength in the Z-axis) because the laser sinters line by line. So if you’re making load-bearing parts—like robot joints or medical implants that need reliable strength everywhere—MJF is better. SLS is fine for structural parts where strength doesn’t need to be perfectly consistent.

Check this comparison table for a quick reference:

Choose MJF if… Choose SLS if…
You need fast turnaround (batches <12 hours) You need niche polymers (e.g., PA6, flame-retardant materials)
Your part requires sharp details/tight tolerances You have a small budget for upfront machinery
You’re producing medium-to-large batches (100+ parts) You need low-volume prototypes (1–10 parts)
You prioritize isotropic strength (load-bearing parts) Your part doesn’t need ultra-fine surface details
Does MJF 3D printing require support structures?2025-08-28T07:54:03+00:00

No, MJF doesn’t need support structures. Its powder bed acts as a natural support for complex geometries—like undercuts, lattices, or hollow parts—so you can print intricate designs directly without extra material or post-processing to remove supports.

Are MJF-printed parts water-resistant?2025-08-28T07:39:55+00:00

It depends on the material and post-processing. Unfinished MJF nylon (PA11/PA12) parts have slight water absorption (around 1-2% for PA12), which can affect dimensions over time. For water-resistant needs, add post-processing like vapor smoothing (seals surface pores) or a hydrophobic coating—making parts suitable for applications like outdoor gear components or mild water-exposed industrial parts.

Go to Top